I noted in yesterday’s post about the NHTSA proposal to withdraw the SAFE I Rule that EPA was expected to follow the NHTSA action by restoring the Clean Air Act Section 209 waiver for California’s Advanced Clean Car program. The ink was barely dry on the post when EPA released a Notice that was considering doing just that.
I have always thought that EPA’s waiver withdrawal stood on very shaky ground – shakier even than the NHTSA preemption argument made in the SAFE I rule. I don’t think it’s going to be difficult for EPA formally to restore the California waiver.
I do still think that it would be an example of my typical dry understatement to say that this isn’t the most elegant way to regulate motor vehicle emissions. Conservatives are right that it’s not ideal for one state to be driving – pardon the pun – the entire national regulatory system.
Here’s hoping that the leverage provided by the waiver restoration provides the basis for the Biden administration and the auto industry to reach an agreement on an aggressive set of limits that will move us towards the EV future we need – thus making the California waiver moot.
As sung in South Pacific, if you don’t have a dream, how are you going to have a dream come true?
Yeah but Trump 2024-2028 would likely try to reverse any Biden national fuel economy plans or agreements. CA + Biden = belt and suspenders.